← Home

@mrsf/rehype-mrsf

npm Repository Homepage

rehype plugin for rendering Sidemark/MRSF (Markdown Review Sidecar Format) review comments

17
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

wictorwilen

Keywords

rehyperehype-pluginunifiedremarkmarkdownreviewsidecarmrsfsidemarkcommentsannotationhighlighttooltiprendering

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Common for new packages; no other risk signals present. ai

Versions (showing 17 of 17)

Version Deps Published
0.5.0 2 / 11
0.4.13 2 / 11
0.4.12 2 / 11
0.4.11 2 / 12
0.4.10 2 / 12
0.4.9 2 / 11
0.4.8 2 / 11
0.4.7 2 / 11
0.4.6 2 / 11
0.4.5 2 / 11
0.4.4 2 / 11
0.4.3 2 / 11
0.4.2 2 / 11
0.4.1 2 / 11
0.4.0 2 / 11
0.3.0 2 / 10
0.2.0 2 / 10

v0.5.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.4.13

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.4.12

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.