@msar/rate-limiter
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@qui-cli/colors | AI (phantom-deps): Declared as dependency but used indirectly via @qui-cli/plugin peer dep; stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.1 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.2.0 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.1.4 | 2 / 7 | |
| 0.1.3 | 2 / 7 | |
| 0.1.2 | 1 / 7 | |
| 0.1.1 | 1 / 7 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 7 |
v0.2.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (battis) than the most recent previously approved version (groton-it) on 2026-07-14, but battis is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.