← Home

@mseva/digit-ui-module-challangeneration

34
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

anou1234anujsingh32mdmujibalamnarinderkumar1aashishgkpmg4nayandhawanmujibalam2000saurabhsingh0001

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer; no behavior change vs approved sibling. ai
source-diff source-size-tripled AI (source-diff): Normal growth from bundling more UI components, no malicious payload found. ai
source-diff net-exec-file:dist/index.modern.js AI (source-diff): Bundle is a standard React/Redux UI module; no actual network fetch or dynamic code execution present in the sample. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): Part of @mseva/digit-ui internal module ecosystem; sparse metadata is a pattern across the suite, not a spam indicator. ai
npm-metadata no-description AI (npm-metadata): Consistent with the rest of the @mseva/digit-ui module family; not a malice signal. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:react-dom AI (phantom-deps): React UI module; react-dom declared as dep but used transitively — stable false positive for this package. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:react-table AI (phantom-deps): UI module with table components; phantom-dep heuristic fires on config references — stable false positive. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:lodash.merge AI (phantom-deps): Utility dep used in config/build context; stable false positive for this package. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:redux-thunk AI (phantom-deps): Redux-based UI module; redux-thunk used via config/middleware setup — stable false positive. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:microbundle-crl AI (phantom-deps): Build tool listed in scripts; phantom-dep heuristic fires on config reference — stable false positive. ai

Versions (showing 34 of 34)

Version Deps Published
1.0.33 14 / 0
1.0.32 14 / 0
1.0.31 14 / 0
1.0.30 14 / 0
1.0.29 14 / 0
1.0.28 14 / 0
1.0.27 14 / 0
1.0.26 14 / 0
1.0.25 14 / 0
1.0.24 14 / 0
1.0.23 14 / 0
1.0.22 14 / 0
1.0.21 14 / 0
1.0.20 14 / 0
1.0.19 14 / 0
1.0.18 14 / 0
1.0.17 14 / 0
1.0.16 14 / 0
1.0.15 14 / 0
1.0.14 14 / 0
1.0.13 14 / 0
1.0.12 13 / 0
1.0.11 13 / 0
1.0.10 13 / 0
1.0.9 13 / 0
1.0.8 13 / 0
1.0.7 13 / 0
1.0.6 13 / 0
1.0.5 13 / 0
1.0.4 13 / 0
1.0.3 9 / 0
1.0.2 9 / 0
1.0.1 9 / 0
1.0.0 9 / 0

v1.0.33

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: anou1234 → narinderkumar1 (on 2026-05-12, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (narinderkumar1) than the most recent previously approved version (anou1234) on 2026-05-12, but narinderkumar1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.32

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: anou1234 → narinderkumar1 (on 2026-05-07, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (narinderkumar1) than the most recent previously approved version (anou1234) on 2026-05-07, but narinderkumar1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.28

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: anujsingh32.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.27

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nayandhawan.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: anujsingh32 → nayandhawan (on 2025-12-31, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (nayandhawan) than the most recent previously approved version (anujsingh32) on 2025-12-31, but nayandhawan is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.25

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nayandhawan.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: anujsingh32 → nayandhawan (on 2025-11-28, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (nayandhawan) than the most recent previously approved version (anujsingh32) on 2025-11-28, but nayandhawan is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.24

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: anujsingh32.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.23

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.22

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.17

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: nayandhawan → anujsingh32 (on 2025-11-17, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (anujsingh32) than the most recent previously approved version (nayandhawan) on 2025-11-17, but anujsingh32 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.10

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nayandhawan.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: anujsingh32 → nayandhawan (on 2025-11-06, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (nayandhawan) than the most recent previously approved version (anujsingh32) on 2025-11-06, but nayandhawan is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.