This version was rejected.
It did not pass GreenFlagged's security review and is not served by the registry.
The findings and risk dispositions below explain why.
Risk Dispositions
(2 applicable to this version, 0 other)
Accepted rules are downgraded to INFO on future analyses; rejected rules escalate to CRITICAL.
Rule
Source
Disposition
Author
Reason
regressed-provenance
provenance
reject
AI
AI (provenance): Provenance regression on an established package is a strong account-compromise indicator; generalizes until CI publishing is restored.
publisher-changed
provenance
reject
AI
AI (provenance): Publisher switch from GitHub Actions to human account coincides with provenance loss and structural package changes — high-risk pattern.
SAST Findings (4)
HIGHProvenance attestation missing — previous versions had itprovenance
This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. The axios attack (March 2026) exhibited exactly this pattern.
HIGHPublisher changed: GitHub Actions → michelengelen (on 2026-04-28)provenance
This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-04-28. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
HIGHNew file with network + code execution: esm/DataGridPremium/DataGridPremium.jssource-diff
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
HIGHNew file with network + code execution: modern/DataGridPremium/DataGridPremium.jssource-diff
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Review Summary
Risk score: 100 (capped from 149). Findings: 4 high (+100), 4 medium (+40), 3 low (+9), 1 info (+0).