@munchi_oy/core
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Build pipeline change (removed prepare/prepublishOnly scripts) plausibly explains missing gitHead; no other risk signals present. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:cors | AI (typosquat): Scoped org package @munchi_oy/core; name reflects org+purpose, not an attempt to impersonate 'cors'. | ai |
Versions (showing 44 of 44)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9.20 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.19 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.18 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.17 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.16 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.15 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.14 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.13 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.11 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.10 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.7 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.3 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.9.2 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.8.5 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.7.2 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.7.0 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.6.0 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.5.12 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.5.9 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.5.8 | 0 / 4 | |
| 1.5.7 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.5.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.5.4 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.5.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.5.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.5.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.4 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.4.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.5 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.4 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.3.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.9 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.8 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.7 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.5 | 0 / 2 |
v1.9.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.19
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (muhammad6920) than the most recent previously approved version (munchi_dev) on 2026-05-31, but muhammad6920 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.9.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.17
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (munchi_dev) than the most recent previously approved version (muhammad6920) on 2026-05-26, but munchi_dev is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.9.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.13
3 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: muhammad6920.
This version was published by a different npm account (muhammad6920) than the most recent previously approved version (munchi_dev) on 2026-05-25, but muhammad6920 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.9.11
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
v1.9.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.3
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.9.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.2
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: munchi_dev.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.