@netless/app-slide
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): No diff vs prior approved version; known maintainer publish, benign env change. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Long-running package with irregular release cadence; no other risk signals. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.99 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.98 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.97 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.96 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.95 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.94 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.93 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.92 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.91 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.90 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.89 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.88 | 0 / 6 |
v0.2.98
3 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: huaguzheng.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (huaguzheng) than the most recent previously approved version (hqer) on 2026-03-23, but huaguzheng is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.97
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (huaguzheng) than the most recent previously approved version (hqer) on 2026-03-11, but huaguzheng is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.96
3 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: huaguzheng.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (huaguzheng) than the most recent previously approved version (hqer) on 2026-02-26, but huaguzheng is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.95
3 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: huaguzheng.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (huaguzheng) than the most recent previously approved version (hqer) on 2026-01-16, but huaguzheng is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.94
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (hqer) than the most recent previously approved version (huaguzheng) on 2026-01-09, but hqer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.93
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.92
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.91
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.90
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.89
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.88
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.