@oclif/test
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:jest | AI (typosquat): Scoped @oclif/test is the official oclif test helper; no relation to jest. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:next | AI (typosquat): Scoped @oclif/test is the official oclif test helper; no relation to next. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:vitest | AI (typosquat): Scoped @oclif/test is the official oclif test helper; no relation to vitest. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.18 | 2 / 20 | |
| 4.1.17 | 2 / 20 | |
| 4.1.16 | 2 / 20 | |
| 4.1.15 | 2 / 20 |
v4.1.18
2 findingsPackage name '@oclif/test' is 1 edit(s) away from popular package 'jest'.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.1.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.1.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.