@ooneex/mailer
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:nodemailer | AI (phantom-deps): Mailer package; nodemailer is a declared dep likely used as a transport option, heuristic false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:react-dom | AI (phantom-deps): Likely used for server-side rendering email templates; declared dep in mailer context. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:resend | AI (phantom-deps): resend is a declared runtime dep used in config/type wiring; phantom-dep heuristic false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@ooneex/http-status | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dep likely used indirectly via re-exports; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all @ooneex/* packages; not a security signal for this ecosystem. | ai |
Versions (showing 34 of 34)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.15 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.14 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.13 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.12 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.11 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.10 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.9 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.7 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.6 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.5 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.4 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.3 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.2 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.1 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.1.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 6 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.0.18 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.17 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.16 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.15 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.14 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.13 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.12 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.11 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.10 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.9 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.8 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.7 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.6 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.5 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.4 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.1 | 5 / 0 |
v1.1.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.