@opengis/gis
<!--  -->
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:got | AI (typosquat): Scoped GIS package @opengis/gis; not a typosquat of 'got'. Edit-distance match is coincidental. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:qs | AI (typosquat): Scoped GIS package @opengis/gis; not a typosquat of 'qs'. Edit-distance match is coincidental. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:base64-decode | AI (semgrep): Base64 decodes a shapefile zip buffer for GIS export; no obfuscation or exfiltration pattern. | ai |
Versions (showing 44 of 145)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.49 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.48 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.47 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.46 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.45 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.44 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.43 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.42 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.41 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.40 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.38 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.37 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.36 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.35 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.34 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.33 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.32 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.31 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.30 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.29 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.28 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.27 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.26 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.25 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.23 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.22 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.21 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.20 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.19 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.18 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.17 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.16 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.15 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.14 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.13 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.12 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.11 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.10 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.9 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.8 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.2.7 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.82 | 2 / 17 | |
| 0.1.76 | 2 / 14 | |
| 0.1.73 | 2 / 12 |
v0.2.49
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (setebosu) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-22, but setebosu is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.48
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-21, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.47
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-21, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.46
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-21, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.45
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.44
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aponasko) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-16, but aponasko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.43
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.42
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (artem_maniakin) than the most recent previously approved version (farizov_maxim) on 2026-01-16, but artem_maniakin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.41
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (artem_maniakin) than the most recent previously approved version (farizov_maxim) on 2026-01-15, but artem_maniakin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.40
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.37
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aponasko) than the most recent previously approved version (farizov_maxim) on 2026-01-14, but aponasko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.36
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aponasko) than the most recent previously approved version (farizov_maxim) on 2026-01-14, but aponasko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.34
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (mchernenko) on 2026-01-14, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.33
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (artem_maniakin) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-14, but artem_maniakin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.32
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-13, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.31
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-13, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.30
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-13, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.29
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-13, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.28
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (artem_maniakin) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-13, but artem_maniakin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.27
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (aponasko) on 2026-01-12, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.26
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aponasko) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-09, but aponasko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.25
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-08, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.23
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aponasko) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-08, but aponasko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.22
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-07, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.21
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mchernenko) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-06, but mchernenko is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.20
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (artem_maniakin) than the most recent previously approved version (setebosu) on 2026-01-06, but artem_maniakin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.18
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (setebosu) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2026-01-05, but setebosu is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.17
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2025-12-30, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.16
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2025-12-30, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.15
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (farizov_maxim) than the most recent previously approved version (artem_maniakin) on 2025-12-26, but farizov_maxim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.82
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.76
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.73
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.