@opentui/core-linux-x64
Prebuilt linux-x64 binaries for @opentui/core
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): Package is explicitly a prebuilt native binary distribution; libopentui.so is the intended artifact. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Prebuilt binary platform packages legitimately have no deps and minimal READMEs. | ai |
Versions (showing 100 of 129)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.16 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.15 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.14 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.107 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.106 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.105 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.104 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.103 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.102 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.101 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.100 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.99 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.98 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.97 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.96 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.95 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.94 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.93 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.92 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.91 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.90 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.89 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.88 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.87 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.86 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.85 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.84 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.83 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.82 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.81 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.80 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.79 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.78 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.77 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.76 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.75 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.74 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.73 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.72 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.71 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.70 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.69 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.68 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.67 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.66 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.65 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.64 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.63 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.62 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.61 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.60 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.59 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.58 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.57 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.56 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.55 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.54 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.53 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.52 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.51 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.50 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.49 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.48 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.47 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.46 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.45 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.44 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.43 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.42 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.41 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.40 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.39 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.38 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.37 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.36 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.35 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.34 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.33 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.32 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.31 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.30 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.29 | 0 / 0 |
v0.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.15
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.14
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.13
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.12
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.11
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.10
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.8
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.7
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.6
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.5
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.4
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.3
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.2
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.1
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.92
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.91
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.90
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.89
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.88
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.87
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.86
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.85
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.84
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.83
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.82
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.81
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.80
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.79
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.78
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.77
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.76
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.75
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.74
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.73
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.72
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.71
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.70
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.69
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.68
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.67
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.66
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.65
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.64
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.63
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.62
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.61
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.60
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.59
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.58
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.57
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.56
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.55
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.54
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.53
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.52
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.51
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.50
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.49
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.48
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.47
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.46
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.45
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.44
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.43
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.42
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.41
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.40
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.39
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.38
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.37
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.36
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.35
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.34
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.33
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.32
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.31
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.30
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.29
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.