@operato/data-grist
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@operato/p13n | AI (dependencies): Same-monorepo sibling dep; stable pattern across all @operato/data-grist versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@operato/input | AI (dependencies): Same-monorepo sibling dep; stable pattern across all @operato/data-grist versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@operato/headroom | AI (dependencies): Same-monorepo sibling dep; stable pattern across all @operato/data-grist versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@operato/pull-to-refresh | AI (dependencies): Same-monorepo sibling dep; stable pattern across all @operato/data-grist versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@operato/time-calculator | AI (dependencies): Same-monorepo sibling dep; stable pattern across all @operato/data-grist versions. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established package with 762 versions; provenance not historically used by this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 27)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2.25 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.22 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.21 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.20 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.19 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.18 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.16 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.15 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.14 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.13 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.12 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.7 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.6 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.5 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.1 | 13 / 18 | |
| 9.2.0 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.24 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.23 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.22 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.20 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.19 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.18 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.17 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.16 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.15 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.14 | 13 / 18 | |
| 8.2.13 | 13 / 18 |
v9.2.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.2.13
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2025-11-10, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.