← Home

@operato/data-mapper

User interface for tree structure data

16
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

heartyohchayeongronggayeon4041jay_leewoo_ramnalshya113

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Monorepo package; provenance not configured for this org's publish workflow. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:i18next AI (phantom-deps): Declared in package.json deps; used via config/indirect import pattern common in this package family. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:lodash-es AI (phantom-deps): Declared in package.json deps; used via config/indirect import pattern common in this package family. ai

Versions (showing 16 of 16)

Version Deps Published
9.2.25 9 / 18
9.2.22 9 / 18
9.2.21 9 / 18
9.2.20 9 / 18
9.2.19 9 / 18
9.2.18 9 / 18
9.2.16 9 / 18
9.2.15 9 / 18
9.2.14 9 / 18
9.2.13 9 / 18
9.2.12 9 / 18
9.2.7 9 / 18
9.2.6 9 / 18
9.2.5 9 / 18
9.2.1 9 / 18
9.2.0 9 / 18

v9.2.25

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.22

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.21

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.20

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.19

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.18

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.16

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v9.2.15

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.14

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.13

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.12

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: nalshya113 → heartyoh (on 2026-03-19, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-19, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v9.2.7

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: nalshya113 → heartyoh (on 2026-03-12, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-12, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v9.2.6

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v9.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.