@or-sdk/flows
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Entire @or-sdk suite lacks descriptions/repo URLs; pattern is consistent across 559 versions, not a malice indicator. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent across @or-sdk packages; not indicative of malicious intent. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance across this SDK family; stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 19 of 19)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7.5 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.7.4 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.7.3 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.7.2 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.7.1 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.7.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.6.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.5.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.5.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.7 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.6 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.5 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.4 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.3 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.2 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.4.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 2.3.6 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.3.5 | 4 / 2 |
v2.7.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.