@orangecheck/auth-core
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Small org package; no CI provenance is consistent with all prior versions and poses no direct security risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 2.3.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.4.1 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.4.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.3.1 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.3.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.2.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 4 |
v2.4.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v2.3.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: ochk.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.4.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.