@platforma-open/milaboratories.clonotype-browser-3.workflow
Tengo-based template
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@platforma-open/milaboratories.software-binary-collection.software-7zip | AI (dependencies): Same org scope dependency; consistent pattern across this package family. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Org-internal workflow package; missing repo/keywords/semver signals are expected for this namespace. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all versions from this org; not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@platforma-sdk/workflow-tengo | AI (phantom-deps): Tengo workflow packages reference deps in build config, not JS imports; stable false positive for this package scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@platforma-open/milaboratories.software-binary-collection.software-7zip | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org binary collection dep used at build/runtime via Tengo tooling, not direct JS import; stable false positive. | ai |
Versions (showing 13 of 13)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.3 | 2 / 5 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 5 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 5 | |
| 2.0.0 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.2.0 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.1.0 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.5 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.4 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.3 | 2 / 5 | |
| 1.0.2 | 2 / 4 | |
| 1.0.1 | 2 / 4 |
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.