@plitzi/plitzi-ui
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Org-scoped UI library with real repo and deps; sparse metadata reflects early-stage project, not spam. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Missing description is a metadata gap, not a risk signal for this scoped package. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6.9 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.8 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.7 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.6 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.5 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.4 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.3 | 28 / 51 | |
| 1.6.2 | 28 / 51 |
v1.6.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.6.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.6.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.6.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.