@polkadot-apps/signer
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal @polkadot-apps monorepo package from paritytech-ci; sparse metadata is expected, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent with internal tooling packages from this publisher; not a malice signal. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): paritytech-ci is a trusted publisher; lack of Sigstore provenance is common and not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.0 | 5 / 3 | |
| 1.0.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 1.0.0 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.2.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.2.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.7 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.6 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.5 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.4 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.1.1 | 4 / 1 |
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.