@privy-io/api-types
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:resources/onramps.d.mts | AI (source-diff): TypeScript declaration file with long union-type lines; not obfuscated. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:resources/onramps.d.ts | AI (source-diff): TypeScript declaration file with long union-type lines; not obfuscated. | ai | |
| source-diff | encoded-string-file:resources/wallets/wallets.d.mts | AI (source-diff): Long hex string is a JSDoc example payload for rawSign; benign and stable for this package. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): ajin-privy-admin is a privy-io org account; consistent with internal admin role addition. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Privy migrated publishing from privy-bot to GitHub Actions CI; org and repo metadata unchanged. | ai | |
| source-diff | encoded-string-file:resources/wallets/wallets.mjs | AI (source-diff): Same JSDoc example hex string in the ESM build; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| source-diff | encoded-string-file:resources/wallets/wallets.js | AI (source-diff): Long hex string is a JSDoc example of a raw transaction payload, not an obfuscated payload. | ai |
Versions (showing 20 of 20)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.15.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.14.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.13.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.12.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.11.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.10.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.9.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.8.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.7.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.6.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.6.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.5.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.4.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.3.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.2.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 0 |
v0.15.0
3 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.0
2 findingsModified file contains 1 long encoded string(s) (200+ chars). These are commonly used to hide malicious payloads.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
3 findingsModified file contains 1 long encoded string(s) (200+ chars). These are commonly used to hide malicious payloads.
Modified file contains 1 long encoded string(s) (200+ chars). These are commonly used to hide malicious payloads.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.7.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-11. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-02. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.