@r2wc/react-to-web-component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Bitovi's open-source packages do not use Sigstore provenance; this is consistent across their ecosystem and not a risk indicator. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.1.0 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.0.4 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.0.3 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.0.2 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.0.1 | 1 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 1 / 2 |
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.