@reltio/mdm-module
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal enterprise scoped package; missing metadata is a consistent pattern across its 2000+ versions, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent across all versions of this internal enterprise package; not a malice signal. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance across all versions; internal package pattern, not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 100)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4.2090 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2089 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2088 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2087 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2086 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2085 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2084 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2083 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2082 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2081 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2080 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2079 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2078 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2077 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2076 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2075 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2074 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2073 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2072 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2071 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2070 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2069 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2068 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2067 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2066 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2065 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2064 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2063 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2062 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2059 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2058 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2057 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2056 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2055 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2054 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2053 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2052 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2051 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2050 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2049 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2048 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2047 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2046 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2045 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2044 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2043 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2042 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2041 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2040 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2039 | 5 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2038 | 5 / 0 |
v1.4.2090
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2089
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2088
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2087
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2086
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2085
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2084
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2083
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2082
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2081
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2080
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2079
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2078
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2077
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2076
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2075
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2074
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2073
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2072
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2071
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2070
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2069
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2068
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2067
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2066
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2065
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2064
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2063
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2062
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2059
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2058
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2057
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2056
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2055
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2054
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2053
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2052
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2051
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2050
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2049
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2048
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2047
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2046
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2045
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2044
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2043
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2042
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2041
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2040
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2039
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2038
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.