← Home

@rhc-shared-components/questionnaire

npm

Reusable Questionnaire component supporting partner (editable) and admin (read-only + approval) views

19
Versions
—
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

gkr-redhateyevanarubingershkaleatharva-upadhye-redhatrecamposayushi_midha

Versions (showing 19 of 19)

Version Deps Published
2.0.0 0 / 21
1.0.17 0 / 21
1.0.16 0 / 19
1.0.15 0 / 19
1.0.14 0 / 19
1.0.13 0 / 19
1.0.12 0 / 19
1.0.11 0 / 19
1.0.10 0 / 19
1.0.9 0 / 18
1.0.8 0 / 18
1.0.7 0 / 18
1.0.6 0 / 18
1.0.5 0 / 10
1.0.4 0 / 10
1.0.3 0 / 10
1.0.2 0 / 10
1.0.1 0 / 10
1.0.0 0 / 10

v2.0.0

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: ayushi_midha → gkr-redhat (on 2026-06-05, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gkr-redhat) than the most recent previously approved version (ayushi_midha) on 2026-06-05, but gkr-redhat is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.17

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.16

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gkr-redhat → ayushi_midha (on 2026-05-06, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (ayushi_midha) than the most recent previously approved version (gkr-redhat) on 2026-05-06, but ayushi_midha is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.15

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.14

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.13

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.12

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.11

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.10

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.9

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gkr-redhat → ayushi_midha (on 2026-04-30, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (ayushi_midha) than the most recent previously approved version (gkr-redhat) on 2026-04-30, but ayushi_midha is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.7

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: ayushi_midha → gkr-redhat (on 2026-04-24, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gkr-redhat) than the most recent previously approved version (ayushi_midha) on 2026-04-24, but gkr-redhat is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.6

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: ayushi_midha → gkr-redhat (on 2026-04-24, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gkr-redhat) than the most recent previously approved version (ayushi_midha) on 2026-04-24, but gkr-redhat is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.4

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.