@rivetkit/engine-runner
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Publisher has 20 approved packages without provenance; consistent pattern, not a new risk. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal scoped monorepo package; missing metadata is expected, not a spam/malware indicator. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent pattern across @rivetkit scoped packages; not indicative of malice. | ai |
Versions (showing 46 of 46)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.10 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.9 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.8 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.7 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.6 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.5 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.4 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.3 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.2 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.1 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.3.0 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.2.1 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.2.0 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.10 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.9 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.8 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.7 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.6 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.5 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.4 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.3 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.2 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.1 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.0 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.42 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.41 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.40 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.39 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.38 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.37 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.36 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.35 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.34 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.0.33 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.32 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.31 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.30 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.29 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.28 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.27 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.26 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.25 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.24 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.23 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.22 | 4 / 7 | |
| 2.0.21 | 4 / 7 |
v2.3.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.