@rivolink/leaf-win32-x64 MIT 36 versions

@rivolink/leaf-win32-x64

npm Repository Homepage

leaf binary for win32 x64

36

Versions

MIT

License

No

Install Scripts

Missing

Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

rivolink

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

Source	Rule	Reason	Accepted by	When
npm-metadata	bundled-binaries	AI (npm-metadata): Package is explicitly a platform-specific binary distribution; bundling leaf.exe is its sole purpose.	ai	2026/05/22
bogus-package	bogus-package	AI (bogus-package): Platform binary shim packages legitimately have no deps, minimal keywords, and terse READMEs.	ai	2026/05/22

Versions (showing 36 of 36)

Version	Deps	Published
1.24.0	0 / 0	2026-05-30
1.23.2	0 / 0	2026-05-28
1.23.1	0 / 0	2026-05-26
1.23.0	0 / 0	2026-05-24
1.22.3	0 / 0	2026-05-20
1.22.2	0 / 0	2026-05-17
1.22.1	0 / 0	2026-05-15
1.22.0	0 / 0	2026-05-13
1.21.2	0 / 0	2026-05-13
1.21.1	0 / 0	2026-05-12
1.21.0	0 / 0	2026-05-09
1.20.2	0 / 0	2026-05-09
1.20.1	0 / 0	2026-05-08
1.20.0	0 / 0	2026-05-07
1.19.1	0 / 0	2026-05-06
1.19.0	0 / 0	2026-05-06
1.18.2	0 / 0	2026-05-03
1.18.1	0 / 0	2026-05-01
1.18.0	0 / 0	2026-04-30
1.17.0	0 / 0	2026-04-28
1.16.0	0 / 0	2026-04-28
1.15.7	0 / 0	2026-04-28
1.15.6	0 / 0	2026-04-27
1.15.5	0 / 0	2026-04-26
1.15.4	0 / 0	2026-04-25
1.15.3	0 / 0	2026-04-24
1.15.2	0 / 0	2026-04-24
1.15.1	0 / 0	2026-04-24
1.15.0	0 / 0	2026-04-23
1.14.0	0 / 0	2026-04-22
1.13.0	0 / 0	2026-04-22
1.12.0	0 / 0	2026-04-20
1.11.1	0 / 0	2026-04-20
1.11.0	0 / 0	2026-04-19
1.10.2	0 / 0	2026-04-18
1.10.1	0 / 0	2026-04-18

v1.24.0

1 finding

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.23.2

1 finding

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.23.1

1 finding

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.23.0

1 finding

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.22.3

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.22.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.22.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.22.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.21.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.21.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.21.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.20.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.20.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.20.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.19.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.19.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.18.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.18.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.18.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.16.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.7

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.6

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.5

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.4

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.3

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.15.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.14.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.13.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.12.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.11.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.11.0

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.10.2

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.10.1

2 findings

HIGH Bundled binary files (1) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • leaf.exe

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.