← Home

@rnx-kit/eslint-plugin

A set of ESLint rules for React developers

10
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

jasonvmorseacoatesrnbottido64rnsdkbothansenyymicrosoft-oss-releasesmicrosoft1es

Keywords

eslinteslintpluginreactreact-nativetypescript

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
semgrep semgrep:dynamic-require AI (semgrep): Dynamic require in ESLint config files is standard practice for this plugin; it resolves config paths conditionally, not from user-controlled input. Stable false positive for this package. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Microsoft rnx-kit uses a bot publisher; lack of Sigstore provenance is acceptable given the established package history and clear Microsoft authorship. ai

Versions (showing 10 of 10)

Version Deps Published
0.9.9 5 / 10
0.9.8 5 / 10
0.9.7 5 / 10
0.9.6 5 / 9
0.9.5 5 / 9
0.9.4 5 / 9
0.9.3 5 / 9
0.9.2 5 / 9
0.9.1 5 / 9
0.9.0 5 / 9

v0.9.9

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.9.8

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.9.7

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.9.6

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.9.5

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.9.4

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.9.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.9.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.