@sk-web-gui/snackbar
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): New publisher oliverborgstromsk has 34 approved packages; consistent with org maintainer rotation, not a takeover. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped UI component in a monorepo; missing metadata is typical for internal component packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.3.0 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.7 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.6 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.5 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.4 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.3 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.2 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.2.0 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.1.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.1.0 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 5 / 1 |
v2.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (devizetim) than the most recent previously approved version (jerkerosatiesk) on 2025-04-09, but devizetim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.2.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (jerkerosatiesk) than the most recent previously approved version (devizetim) on 2025-03-31, but jerkerosatiesk is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (devizetim) than the most recent previously approved version (jerkerosatiesk) on 2025-01-30, but devizetim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.0.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (devizetim) than the most recent previously approved version (jerkerosatiesk) on 2025-01-02, but devizetim is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.