← Home

@spectrum-web-components/asset

Use an `<sp-asset>` element to visually represent a file, folder or image in your application. File and folder representations will center themselves horizontally and vertically in the space provided to the element. Images will be contained to the element

19
Versions
Apache-2.0
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Maintainers

caseyisonittaratadoberajrock38jnjoshnikkimkrubencjianliao79pvashishpatrickfulton

Keywords

design-systemspectrumadobeadobe-spectrumweb componentsweb-componentslit-elementlit-htmlcomponentcss

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
dependencies unvetted-dep:@spectrum-web-components/base AI (dependencies): Same Adobe monorepo sibling dependency; stable pattern across all versions of this package family. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Adobe's Spectrum WC monorepo consistently publishes without Sigstore provenance; stable pattern across all versions. ai

Versions (showing 19 of 19)

Version Deps Published
1.11.2 2 / 0
1.11.1 2 / 0
1.11.0 2 / 0
1.10.0 2 / 0
1.9.1 1 / 0
1.8.0 1 / 0
1.7.0 1 / 0
1.6.0 1 / 1
1.5.0 1 / 1
1.4.0 1 / 1
1.3.0 1 / 1
1.2.0 1 / 1
1.1.2 1 / 1
1.1.1 1 / 1
1.1.0 1 / 1
1.0.3 1 / 1
1.0.2 1 / 1
1.0.1 1 / 1
1.0.0 1 / 1

v1.5.0

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2025-04-15, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-04-15, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.4.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.3.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.2.0

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rajrock38 → rubenc (on 2025-02-27, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rubenc) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2025-02-27, but rubenc is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.1.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.1.1

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2025-01-29, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-01-29, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.1.0

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2025-01-29, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-01-29, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.3

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rajrock38 → rubenc (on 2024-12-10, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rubenc) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2024-12-10, but rubenc is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.2

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rajrock38 → pvashish (on 2024-11-26, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (pvashish) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2024-11-26, but pvashish is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.