@spectrum-web-components/link
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:pino | AI (typosquat): Scoped Adobe design-system package; no relation to pino logger. Levenshtein match is spurious. | ai |
Versions (showing 18 of 18)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.12.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.12.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.11.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.11.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.11.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.10.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.9.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.9.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.8.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.7.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.6.0 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.5.0 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.1.0 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.3 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.2 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.1 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.0 | 2 / 1 |
v1.12.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-01-29, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rubenc) than the most recent previously approved version (pvashish) on 2024-12-10, but rubenc is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (pvashish) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2024-11-26, but pvashish is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2024-11-11, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.