← Home

@spectrum-web-components/story-decorator

[![See it on NPM!](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@spectrum-web-components/story-decorator?style=for-the-badge)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@spectrum-web-components/story-decorator) [![How big is this package in your project?](https://img.shields.io/bund

23
Versions
Apache-2.0
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Maintainers

caseyisonittaratadoberajrock38jnjoshnikkimkrubencjianliao79pvashishpatrickfulton

Keywords

spectrum cssweb componentslit-elementlit-html

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions CI publishing with SLSA provenance; expected for Adobe org monorepo automation. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@spectrum-web-components/overlay AI (phantom-deps): Sibling monorepo package; declared as dep and used indirectly within the same org scope. ai

Versions (showing 23 of 23)

Version Deps Published
1.12.2 8 / 0
1.12.1 8 / 0
1.12.0 8 / 0
1.11.2 8 / 0
1.11.1 8 / 0
1.11.0 8 / 0
1.10.0 8 / 0
1.9.1 8 / 0
1.9.0 8 / 0
1.8.0 8 / 0
1.7.0 8 / 0
1.6.0 8 / 0
1.5.0 8 / 0
1.4.0 8 / 0
1.3.0 8 / 0
1.2.0 8 / 0
1.1.2 8 / 0
1.1.1 8 / 0
1.1.0 8 / 0
1.0.3 8 / 0
1.0.2 8 / 0
1.0.1 8 / 0
1.0.0 8 / 0

v1.12.2

1 finding
INFO Has SLSA provenance attestation provenance

Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.

v1.5.0

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2025-04-15, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-04-15, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.4.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.3.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.2.0

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rajrock38 → rubenc (on 2025-02-27, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rubenc) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2025-02-27, but rubenc is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.1.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.1.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.1.0

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2025-01-29, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2025-01-29, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.3

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: pvashish → rubenc (on 2024-12-09, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rubenc) than the most recent previously approved version (pvashish) on 2024-12-09, but rubenc is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.2

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rajrock38 → pvashish (on 2024-11-26, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (pvashish) than the most recent previously approved version (rajrock38) on 2024-11-26, but pvashish is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.1

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: rubenc → rajrock38 (on 2024-11-11, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rajrock38) than the most recent previously approved version (rubenc) on 2024-11-11, but rajrock38 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.