@stdlib/utils-constructor-name
Determine the name of a value's constructor.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | url-dep:tape | AI (npm-metadata): Dev-only test dep URL pin; longstanding stdlib pattern, no runtime impact. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Stdlib packages consistently lack provenance attestation; stable false positive for this org. | ai |
Versions (showing 14 of 14)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.0 | 3 / 27 | |
| 0.1.1 | 3 / 26 | |
| 0.1.0 | 3 / 26 | |
| 0.0.8 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.7 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.6 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.5 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.4 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.3 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.2 | 3 / 24 | |
| 0.0.1 | 3 / 24 |
v0.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.