@stricahq/bip32ed25519
1
Versions
—
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
No SLSA provenance
npm registry signatures
gitHead linked
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
ashisherc
Keywords
bip32ed25519stricacardano
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:elliptic | AI (dependencies): elliptic is a well-known, widely-used cryptographic library; its use is appropriate and expected in a BIP32-Ed25519 implementation. Pinning to 6.6.1 is intentional security practice. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Lack of provenance is common across npm and not a security concern for this established package with a clear, linked repository. | ai |
Versions (showing 1 of 1)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.2 | 6 / 22 |
v1.1.2
1 finding
LOW
No provenance attestation
provenance
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.