@telia-ace/widget-services
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped internal package in a 317-version org namespace; sparse metadata is a namespace-wide pattern, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent across the @telia-ace namespace; not a malice signal for this org. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance across the entire @telia-ace namespace; stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 45 of 45)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3.48 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.47 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.46 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.45 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.44 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.43 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.42 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.41 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.40 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.39 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.38 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.37 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.36 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.35 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.30 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.29 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.28 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.27 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.26 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.25 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.24 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.23 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.22 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.21 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.20 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.19 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.18 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.17 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.16 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.14 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.13 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.12 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.5 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.3.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.2.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.2.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.2.9 | 2 / 0 |
v1.3.48
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.47
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.46
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.45
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.44
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (andreas.boukaras) than the most recent previously approved version (teliajm) on 2026-06-30, but andreas.boukaras is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.3.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.5
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (donami) than the most recent previously approved version (teliajm) on 2024-10-25, but donami is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.3.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.