@tencentcloud/trtc-cloud-wx
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer; no behavioral change vs prior approved version. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Publisher matched as known maintainer on prior versions, not a compromise indicator. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Established Tencent Cloud org package with 60 versions; sparse metadata is typical for corporate SDK wrappers. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Corporate SDK; missing description is cosmetic, not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 11 of 11)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.7 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.6 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.4 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 3 / 0 |
v1.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (jiushu530) than the most recent previously approved version (mileszzhang) on 2025-02-18, but jiushu530 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.1
3 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jiushu530.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (jiushu530) than the most recent previously approved version (mileszzhang) on 2024-12-03, but jiushu530 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.