@terminal3/verify_vc
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal scoped package in an established org; missing metadata is consistent across all versions, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:ethers | AI (phantom-deps): Likely re-exported or used indirectly via @terminal3 sub-packages; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:did-jwt | AI (phantom-deps): Same pattern as ethers — indirect use via internal deps; stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@noble/curves | AI (phantom-deps): Cryptographic primitive likely consumed by @terminal3/bbs_vc or ecdsa_vc; stable false positive. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.38 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.37 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.35 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.34 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.33 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.32 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.31 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.30 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.29 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.28 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.27 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.0.26 | 6 / 1 |
v0.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.37
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (phuc-t3) than the most recent previously approved version (trha) on 2026-05-06, but phuc-t3 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.35
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (phuc-t3) than the most recent previously approved version (trha) on 2026-04-24, but phuc-t3 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.34
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.32
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.31
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (trha) than the most recent previously approved version (phuc-t3) on 2025-11-13, but trha is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.30
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (trha) than the most recent previously approved version (phuc-t3) on 2025-10-28, but trha is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.29
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nik-t3) than the most recent previously approved version (phuc-t3) on 2025-09-05, but nik-t3 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.28
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nik-t3) than the most recent previously approved version (phuc-t3) on 2025-09-05, but nik-t3 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.26
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.