@theia/messages
Theia - Messages Extension
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Eclipse Theia monorepo; provenance absence is consistent across all its packages. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@theia/core | AI (dependencies): @theia/core is a first-party sibling package in the same Eclipse Theia monorepo; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| license | weak-copyleft-license:EPL-2.0 | AI (license): Standard Eclipse Theia license; stable across all versions of this package. | ai | |
| license | copyleft-license:GPL-2.0-only | AI (license): Standard dual-license for Eclipse Theia; stable across all versions. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:Classpath-exception-2.0 | AI (license): Classpath exception is part of the standard Eclipse Theia dual-license; stable across all versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 32 of 32)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.72.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.72.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.71.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.71.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.71.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.70.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.70.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.70.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.69.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.68.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.68.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.66.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.66.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.66.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.65.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.65.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.65.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.64.4 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.64.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.64.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.64.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.64.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.63.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.63.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.63.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.63.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.62.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.62.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.62.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.61.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.61.0 | 4 / 1 |
v1.72.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.72.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.72.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.71.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.71.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.70.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.69.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.68.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.68.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.66.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v0.2). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.66.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v0.2). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.66.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v0.2). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.65.2
2 findingsPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v0.2). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
This version was published by a different npm account (eclipse-theia-bot) than the most recent previously approved version (ndoschek) on 2025-10-14, but eclipse-theia-bot is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.65.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.65.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.64.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.64.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.64.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.64.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.64.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.63.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.63.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.63.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.63.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.62.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.62.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.62.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (jfaltermeier) than the most recent previously approved version (sgraband) on 2025-05-28, but jfaltermeier is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.61.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.61.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.