@things-factory/auth-google
Module for Supporting User Authentication with Google
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Long-lived package with 323 versions; provenance attestation has never been part of this package's publish flow. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:passport | AI (phantom-deps): passport is a peer/runtime dep declared in package.json; phantom-dep heuristic fires but it's legitimately used by this auth module. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@operato/shell | AI (phantom-deps): Org-internal dep referenced in config; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@operato/graphql | AI (phantom-deps): Org-internal dep referenced in config; stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 17 of 17)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2.24 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.2.19 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.2.17 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.2.16 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.2.13 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.2.5 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.1.19 | 7 / 0 | |
| 9.0.0 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.88 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.87 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.86 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.75 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.74 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.64 | 7 / 0 | |
| 8.0.63 | 7 / 0 | |
| 6.4.10 | 7 / 0 | |
| 6.4.8 | 7 / 0 |
v9.2.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.13
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-19, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.2.5
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-03-06, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.1.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.0.88
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.0.87
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.86
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-03-05, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v8.0.75
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-01-12, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v8.0.74
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-01-02, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v8.0.64
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.63
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v6.4.10
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-30, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v6.4.8
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-29, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.