@things-factory/calendar
A module for event scheduling
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| semgrep | semgrep:dynamic-require | AI (semgrep): Migration file loader pattern — requires files from a known local directory, not user-controlled input. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 16)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2.24 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.2.19 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.2.17 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.2.16 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.2.13 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.2.5 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.1.19 | 5 / 0 | |
| 9.0.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.88 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.87 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.75 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.74 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.64 | 5 / 0 | |
| 8.0.63 | 5 / 0 | |
| 6.4.10 | 5 / 0 | |
| 6.4.8 | 5 / 0 |
v9.2.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.17
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-04-01, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.2.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.13
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-19, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.2.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-03-06, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.1.19
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2025-11-25, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v9.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v8.0.88
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-03-30, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v8.0.87
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.75
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (nalshya113) than the most recent previously approved version (heartyoh) on 2026-01-12, but nalshya113 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v8.0.74
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.64
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.63
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v6.4.10
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-30, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v6.4.8
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (heartyoh) than the most recent previously approved version (nalshya113) on 2026-03-29, but heartyoh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.