← Home

@tinkoff/request-plugin-retry

12
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

tinkoffbankdmitry-korolevyeahgahondasmxmakar_lroulandishivanytsarevashoom3301waterpleameskillmarsibarsizig-greensuper_olegdersizesalexkvaksradyukov

Keywords

request

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): No behavioral change accompanies it; likely monorepo publish tooling artifact. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): Publisher track record strong (4689 approved); no malicious diff accompanies the change. ai

Versions (showing 12 of 12)

Version Deps Published
0.3.1 2 / 1
0.3.0 2 / 1
0.2.4 2 / 1
0.2.3 2 / 1
0.2.2 2 / 1
0.2.1 2 / 1
0.2.0 2 / 1
0.1.5 2 / 1
0.1.4 2 / 1
0.1.3 2 / 1
0.1.2 2 / 1
0.1.1 2 / 1

v0.2.4

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: meskill → marsibarsi (on 2023-08-02, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (marsibarsi) than the most recent previously approved version (meskill) on 2023-08-02, but marsibarsi is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v0.2.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.2.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.2.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.1.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.1.4

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.1.3

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: meskill.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.1.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.1.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.