@tinkoff/utils
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vendored-integrity | tampered-vendored-dep:build | AI (vendored-integrity): Only package.json/CHANGELOG differ — routine metadata, not payload. | ai | |
| vendored-integrity | tampered-vendored-dep:. | AI (vendored-integrity): Root package.json diff is expected version metadata. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Stale 2019 transition, long-stable, no malicious behavior since. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Same stale 2019 transition; no evidence of takeover. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed-stale | AI (provenance): Change is old and stable per analyzer's own note; not indicative of compromise. | ai |
Versions (showing 21 of 21)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6.2 | 0 / 27 | |
| 2.6.1 | 0 / 27 | |
| 2.6.0 | 0 / 31 | |
| 2.5.6 | 0 / 27 | |
| 2.5.5 | 0 / 27 | |
| 2.5.4 | 0 / 31 | |
| 2.5.3 | 0 / 31 | |
| 2.5.2 | 0 / 31 | |
| 2.5.1 | 0 / 31 | |
| 2.5.0 | 0 / 29 | |
| 2.4.0 | 0 / 29 | |
| 2.3.2 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.3.1 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.3.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.2.1 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.2.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.1.3 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.1.2 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.1.1 | 0 / 30 | |
| 2.1.0 | 0 / 29 | |
| 2.0.0 | 0 / 29 |
v2.6.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.6.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (marsibarsi) than the most recent previously approved version (meskill) on 2023-07-31, but marsibarsi is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.5.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.4
3 findingsThe directory `build` byte-matched 364 of 366 file(s) against @tinkoff/[email protected] — a version that passed review and that we hold in storage — which identifies it as a vendored copy of that package. But 2 file(s) inside it differ from that package's bytes at the same path: build/CHANGELOG.md, build/package.json. A vendored library that is a faithful copy except for a handful of altered files is a well-worn supply-chain shape — the surrounding real code lends the tree legitimacy while the altered files carry the payload. These files are NOT exempt from any authorship heuristic; diff them against @tinkoff/[email protected] before greenflagging.
The directory `.` byte-matched 0 of 0 file(s) against an upstream package — a version that passed review and that we hold in storage — which identifies it as a vendored copy of that package. But 1 file(s) inside it differ from that package's bytes at the same path: package.json. A vendored library that is a faithful copy except for a handful of altered files is a well-worn supply-chain shape — the surrounding real code lends the tree legitimacy while the altered files carry the payload. These files are NOT exempt from any authorship heuristic; diff them against an upstream package before greenflagging.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (meskill) than the most recent previously approved version (tom910) on 2020-09-10, but meskill is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (tom910) than the most recent previously approved version (osorokotyaga) on 2019-09-16, but tom910 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account (meskill) than the most recent previously approved version (osorokotyaga) on 2019-09-02. It has since remained available on npm for 2518 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account (meskill) than the most recent previously approved version (osorokotyaga) on 2019-08-22. It has since remained available on npm for 2528 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.