All @tiptap/extension-focus versions

@tiptap/extension-focus @2.27.2

rejected
This version was rejected. It did not pass GreenFlagged's security review and is not served by the registry. The findings and risk dispositions below explain why.
35
Risk Score
License
No
Install Scripts
0
Dependencies
2
Dev Dependencies
4.5 KB
Package Size
Published

Maintainers

arnaugomeztiptappatrickbabertimoisik_bdbchsvenadlungtiptap-bot

Keywords

tiptaptiptap extension

Dev Dependencies (2)

PackageConstraintRegistry Status
@tiptap/pm ^2.27.2 auto_approved
@tiptap/core ^2.27.2 auto_approved

Changes from v3.13.0

Dependency Changes

Script Changes

+ clean - lint

File Changes

6 added 2 removed 8 modified size delta: +24.5 KB

Risk Dispositions (2 applicable to this version, 0 other)

Accepted rules are downgraded to INFO on future analyses; rejected rules escalate to CRITICAL.

Rule Source Disposition Author Reason
regressed-provenance provenance reject AI AI (provenance): Provenance regression is a persistent risk signal for this package until CI/CD attestations are restored.
publisher-changed provenance reject AI AI (provenance): Publisher change from tiptap-bot to _bdbch coincides with provenance regression; generalizes as a risk signal.

SAST Findings (2)

HIGH Provenance attestation missing — previous versions had it provenance

This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. The axios attack (March 2026) exhibited exactly this pattern.

HIGH Publisher changed: tiptap-bot → _bdbch (on 2026-01-07) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-01-07. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

Review Summary

Risk score: 35. Findings: 1 high (+25), 1 medium (+10), 2 info (+0).

Commit: 4b8d4e9434cd Browse source

Published to npm: