@toptal/picasso-amount
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): SLSA provenance attestation present; gitHead absence is superseded by Sigstore attestation for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 10 of 10)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.14 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.13 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.12 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.5 | 2 / 1 |
v1.0.14
2 findingsPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: GitHub Actions.
v1.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.