@trezor/device-utils
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Trezor monorepo sub-package; sparse metadata is a consistent pattern across all @trezor scoped packages. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent with @trezor monorepo publishing pattern; not indicative of malicious intent. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.1.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.1.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.1.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.1.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.1.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 1.0.3 | 0 / 1 |
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.