@tryghost/color-utils
`npm install @tryghost/color-utils --save`
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Ghost Foundation migrated publishing to GitHub Actions CI with SLSA attestation; stable pattern for this org. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): New maintainers are Ghost Foundation employees (ghost-suffixed accounts); legitimate org roster change. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Removal of ibalosh consistent with org-level maintainer rotation, not a takeover signal. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/color | AI (phantom-deps): @types/color is a type declaration package; not directly imported at runtime by convention. | ai |
Versions (showing 47 of 47)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.19 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.18 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.17 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.16 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.15 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.14 | 2 / 11 | |
| 0.2.13 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.12 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.10 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.9 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.8 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.7 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.6 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.5 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.4 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.3 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.2 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.1 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.2.0 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.1.27 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.26 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.25 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.24 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.23 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.22 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.21 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.20 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.19 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.18 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.17 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.16 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.15 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.14 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.13 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.12 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.11 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.10 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.9 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.8 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.7 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.6 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.5 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.4 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.3 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.2 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.1 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 9 |
v0.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mike182uk) than the most recent previously approved version (binary-koan) on 2024-04-25, but mike182uk is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (9larsons) than the most recent previously approved version (binary-koan) on 2023-11-15, but 9larsons is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (binary-koan) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2023-10-30, but binary-koan is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.27
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2023-07-19, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.26
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2023-05-08, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.25
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2023-04-12, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.24
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2023-03-15, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.23
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (simonbackx) on 2023-03-09, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.22
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (simonbackx) on 2022-11-29, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.21
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (simonbackx) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-09-06, but simonbackx is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.20
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rishabhgrg) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-08-05, but rishabhgrg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.18
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (erisds) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-05-27, but erisds is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.17
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (simonbackx) on 2022-05-16, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.15
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (simonbackx) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-05-09, but simonbackx is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.14
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (erisds) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-05-05, but erisds is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.12
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rishabhgrg) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-03-15, but rishabhgrg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.10
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (allouis) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2022-03-07, but allouis is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.9
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (allouis) on 2022-03-04, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (allouis) than the most recent previously approved version (rishabhgrg) on 2022-01-30, but allouis is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.6
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (allouis) than the most recent previously approved version (rishabhgrg) on 2022-01-20, but allouis is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rishabhgrg) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2021-11-15, but rishabhgrg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2021-11-08, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2021-08-04, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.