@tryghost/kg-unsplash-selector
Unsplash Selector in React
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): CI monorepo publish quirk; SLSA attestation still present, no behavior change. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Common across TryGhost internal sub-packages; not a malware indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 54 of 54)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.4.4 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.4.3 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.4.2 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.4.1 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.4.0 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.26 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.25 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.24 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.23 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.22 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.21 | 0 / 21 | |
| 0.3.20 | 0 / 22 | |
| 0.3.19 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.18 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.17 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.16 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.15 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.14 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.13 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.12 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.11 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.10 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.9 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.7 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.6 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.5 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.4 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.3 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.2 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.3.0 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.8 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.7 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.6 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.5 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.4 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.3 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.2 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.1 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.2.0 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.17 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.16 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.15 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.14 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.13 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.12 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.11 | 0 / 23 | |
| 0.1.10 | 0 / 22 | |
| 0.1.9 | 0 / 22 | |
| 0.1.8 | 0 / 22 | |
| 0.1.7 | 0 / 21 | |
| 0.1.6 | 0 / 21 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 21 | |
| 0.1.0 | 0 / 21 |
v0.4.5
2 findingsPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: GitHub Actions.
v0.4.4
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: GitHub Actions.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.3.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2025-02-17, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.8
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (ronaldlangeveld) on 2025-01-29, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.7
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (ronaldlangeveld) on 2025-01-08, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.6
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ronaldlangeveld) than the most recent previously approved version (vershwal) on 2024-10-31, but ronaldlangeveld is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (vershwal) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2024-09-03, but vershwal is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.13
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (ronaldlangeveld) on 2024-04-16, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.