@tryghost/nql
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): lodash is a canonical utility library; addition is benign for this Ghost Foundation package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:qs | AI (typosquat): Scoped @tryghost package; Levenshtein match to 'qs' is a false positive with no brand impersonation. | ai |
Versions (showing 21 of 21)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.13.1 | 5 / 11 | |
| 0.13.0 | 5 / 11 | |
| 0.12.11 | 5 / 11 | |
| 0.12.10 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.8 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.7 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.6 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.5 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.4 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.3 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.2 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.12.0 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.11.0 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.10.0 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.9.2 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.9.1 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.9.0 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.8.2 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.8.1 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.8.0 | 4 / 11 | |
| 0.7.1 | 4 / 11 |
v0.12.7
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (9larsons) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2024-10-17, but 9larsons is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.6
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (sagzy) on 2024-10-09, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sagzy) than the most recent previously approved version (vershwal) on 2024-09-05, but sagzy is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (vershwal) than the most recent previously approved version (9larsons) on 2024-08-22, but vershwal is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (simonbackx) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2022-10-25, but simonbackx is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.9.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (erisds) on 2022-04-01, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.9.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (erisds) than the most recent previously approved version (daniellockyer) on 2022-03-08, but erisds is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.8.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daniellockyer) than the most recent previously approved version (erisds) on 2022-03-04, but daniellockyer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.8.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.7.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.