@tryghost/timezone-data
`npm install @tryghost/timezone-data --save`
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer, no code changes; not a security signal. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed-known-maintainer | AI (provenance): Known maintainer publishing, already flagged INFO by analyzer. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Ghost Foundation migrated publishing to GitHub Actions CI with SLSA attestation; stable pattern for this org. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): evanhahn-ghost is a Ghost Foundation team member; routine org maintainer rotation. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): ibalosh removal paired with new Ghost team member; consistent with org team change, not takeover. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 108)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.6 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.5 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.4 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.3 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.2 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.1 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.2.0 | 0 / 10 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 11 |
v0.2.6
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2019-07-25, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2019-06-13, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (kevinansfield) than the most recent previously approved version (gargol) on 2019-06-03, but kevinansfield is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gargol) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2019-05-21, but gargol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rishabhgrg) than the most recent previously approved version (kevinansfield) on 2019-04-15, but rishabhgrg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.