@types/gapi
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:https://github.com/sgtfrankieboy | AI (email-domain): Author field is a GitHub URL misparsed as email domain; stable FP for DefinitelyTyped packages. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:hapi | AI (typosquat): gapi (Google API) is a distinct namespace from hapi; not a typosquat. | ai |
Versions (showing 20 of 20)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.47 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.46 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.45 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.44 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.43 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.42 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.41 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.40 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.39 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.38 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.37 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.36 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.35 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.34 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.33 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.32 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.31 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.30 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.29 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.28 | 0 / 0 |
v0.0.46
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.45
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.44
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.43
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.42
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.41
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.40
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.39
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.36
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.34
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.32
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.29
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.28
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/sgtfrankieboy' uses domain 'https://github.com/sgtfrankieboy' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.