← Home

@types/text-encoding

npm Repository Homepage
14
Versions
—
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

types

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
email-domain unclaimed-email:https://github.com/pine613/ AI (email-domain): The 'email' field contains a GitHub profile URL, not an actual email address. No real domain hijack risk; this is a cosmetic metadata quirk stable across all versions of this package. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): @types/ packages are intentionally tiny, dependency-free, and keyword-sparse by design. These signals are expected and stable for all versions of this type-definition package. ai

Versions (showing 14 of 14)

Version Deps Published
0.0.40 0 / 0
0.0.39 0 / 0
0.0.38 0 / 0
0.0.37 0 / 0
0.0.36 0 / 0
0.0.35 0 / 0
0.0.34 0 / 0
0.0.33 0 / 0
0.0.32 0 / 0
0.0.31 0 / 0
0.0.30 0 / 0
0.0.29 0 / 0
0.0.28 0 / 0
0.0.26 0 / 0

v0.0.40

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.39

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.38

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.37

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.36

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.35

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.34

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.33

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.32

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.31

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.30

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.29

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.28

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.26

2 findings
HIGH Unclaimed maintainer email domain: https://github.com/pine613/ email-domain

Maintainer email 'https://github.com/pine613/' uses domain 'https://github.com/pine613/' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.