@unovis/vue
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-takeover | AI (maintainer-change): Publisher is a known prior maintainer; long-lived version, not an active takeover. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:vite | AI (typosquat): Scoped package @unovis/vue is a legitimate F5 data viz library; Levenshtein match to 'vite' is coincidental. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:yup | AI (typosquat): Scoped package @unovis/vue is a legitimate F5 data viz library; Levenshtein match to 'yup' is coincidental. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6.7 | 0 / 19 | |
| 1.6.6 | 0 / 19 | |
| 1.6.5 | 0 / 19 | |
| 1.6.4 | 0 / 18 | |
| 1.6.2 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.6.1 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.6.0 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.5.2 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.5.1 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.5.0 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.4.5 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.4.4 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.4.3 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.4.2 | 0 / 16 | |
| 1.4.1 | 0 / 16 |
v1.6.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (lee00678) than the most recent previously approved version (rebeccabol) on 2024-11-27, but lee00678 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.4.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rebeccabol) than the most recent previously approved version (lee00678) on 2024-07-16, but rebeccabol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.4.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rebeccabol) than the most recent previously approved version (lee00678) on 2024-06-28, but rebeccabol is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.