@vaadin/polymer-legacy-adapter
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Vaadin internal adapter package; sparse README/description is consistent across all 519 versions of this org's packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 39 of 39)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 24.10.3 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.10.2 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.10.1 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.10.0 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.16 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.15 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.14 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.13 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.12 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.11 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.10 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.9 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.8 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.7 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.6 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.5 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.4 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.3 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.2 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.9.1 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.14 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.13 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.12 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.11 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.10 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.8 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.7 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.6 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.4 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.2 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.8.1 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.7.12 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.7.10 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.7.7 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.7.6 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.6.11 | 3 / 7 | |
| 24.6.10 | 3 / 7 | |
| 23.6.4 | 3 / 6 | |
| 23.6.3 | 3 / 6 |
v24.10.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.10.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.10.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.10.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.9.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.9.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.9.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.9.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.8.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.8.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.8.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.8.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.7.12
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.7.10
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.7.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.7.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.6.11
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.6.10
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'jouni.me' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v23.6.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.6.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.