← Home

@vc-shell/config-generator

Generate Vite configurations

11
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Maintainers

virtoandrew.kubyshkin

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
dependencies unvetted-dep:vite-plugin-circular-dependency AI (dependencies): Legitimate Vite plugin for circular dependency detection; no malware indicators, stable use in this config-generator package. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:vite-plugin-mkcert AI (dependencies): vite-plugin-mkcert is a legitimate, widely-used Vite plugin; stable false positive for this config-generator package. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Established package with 505 versions; lack of provenance is consistent across all prior releases. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:vue AI (phantom-deps): vue is a legitimate declared runtime dependency for a Vite config generator; phantom-dep is a false positive here. ai

Versions (showing 11 of 11)

Version Deps Published
2.0.6 8 / 5
2.0.5 8 / 5
2.0.4 8 / 5
2.0.3 8 / 5
2.0.2 8 / 5
2.0.1 8 / 5
2.0.0 8 / 5
1.2.3 5 / 5
1.2.2 5 / 5
1.2.1 5 / 5
1.2.0 5 / 5

v2.0.6

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.5

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: virto → andrew.kubyshkin (on 2026-05-25, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (andrew.kubyshkin) than the most recent previously approved version (virto) on 2026-05-25, but andrew.kubyshkin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v2.0.4

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.2.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.2.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.2.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.2.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.